Plaintiffs opposed defendants’ request for judgment on the pleadings by filing a brief on September 2, 2016.  The brief asserted that the plaintiffs’ original allegations were sufficient to support a finding that UberBLACK drivers were employed by Defendants, and that there was a fiduciary relationship between the parties.

Read plaintiffs’ opposition brief here: plaintiffs-brief-in-opposition-to-defendants-motion-for-judgment-on-the-pleadings