Philadelphia UberBLACK Lawsuit

Razak, et al. v. Uber Technologies, Inc., et al., Civ. No. 16-0573 (E.D. Pa)

Home
About
Media Coverage
Contact
Drivers’ Attorney

Search for:

Dec. 29, 2016: Uber Files an Answer to the First Amended Complaint

January 9, 2017 / Admin

On December 29, 2016, defendants filed an answer with affirmative defenses to plaintiffs’ first amended complaint.

Read defendants’ answer here: 12.29.16 – Answer to First Amended Complaint.

Like this:

Like Loading...

Uncategorized

← Dec. 15, 2016: Judge Baylson Denies Uber’s Third Motion to Dismiss, Allowing Plaintiffs’ Overtime Claims to Proceed

March 3, 2017: Uber issues a refund, a new addendum formally increases Uber’s commission, and local drivers affiliate with the Newspaper Guild →

Drivers’ Attorneys

Jeremy E. Abay, Esq.
John K. Weston, Esq.
Sacks Weston LLC
1845 Walnut Street, Suite 1600
Philadelphia, PA 19103
Tel: (215) 925-8200
jabay@sackslaw.com

About the Lawsuit

Razak, et al. v. Uber Technologies, Inc., et al., Civ. No. 16-0573 (E.D. Pa)

UberBLACK drivers filed a putative class action in federal court in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The lawsuit claims that Uber and its subsidiary, Gegen, misclassify UberBLACK drivers as independent contractors. The lawsuit seeks wages and reimbursement of business expenses for UberBLACK drivers operating in Philadelphia.

Uber cannot retaliate against its drivers for participating in this lawsuit.

Follow Blog via Email

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Email Address:

Share this:

Like this:

Related