Philadelphia UberBLACK Lawsuit

Razak, et al. v. Uber Technologies, Inc., et al., Civ. No. 16-0573 (E.D. Pa)

Skip to content
  • Home
  • About
  • Media Coverage
  • Contact
  • Drivers’ Attorney
Search

Oral Argument Audio Now Available From Appellate Court

April 9, 2020 / Admin

The Third Circuit Court of Appeals held oral argument on January 15, 2019.  The audio recording is available here: https://www.courtlistener.com/audio/60965/razak-v-uber-technologies-inc/.

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Uncategorized

Post navigation

← May 1, 2019: Uber Files Supplemental Authority, Citing New DOL Memo
March 3, 2020: Third Circuit Revives UberBLACK Drivers’ Case →

Drivers’ Attorney

Jeremy E. Abay, Esq.
Sacks Weston Diamond, LLC
1845 Walnut Street, Suite 1600
Philadelphia, PA 19103
Tel: (215) 925-8200
jabay@sackslaw.com

About the Lawsuit

Razak, et al. v. Uber Technologies, Inc., et al., Civ. No. 16-0573 (E.D. Pa)

A putative class action was filed by three UberBLACK drivers in federal court in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The lawsuit claims that Uber and its subsidiary, Gegen, misclassify UberBLACK drivers as independent contractors. The lawsuit seeks wages and reimbursement of business expenses for UberBLACK drivers operating in Philadelphia.

Uber cannot retaliate against its drivers for participating in this lawsuit.

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Recent Posts

  • March 17, 2020: Uber Seeks En Banc Review of Appellate Opinion April 9, 2020
  • March 3, 2020: Third Circuit Revives UberBLACK Drivers’ Case April 9, 2020
  • Oral Argument Audio Now Available From Appellate Court April 9, 2020
  • May 1, 2019: Uber Files Supplemental Authority, Citing New DOL Memo April 9, 2020
  • April 11, 2019: Uber’s IPO Filings Identify Philadelphia Drivers’ Case as a Threat April 9, 2020
Blog at WordPress.com.
%d bloggers like this: