Feb. 26, 2018: Plaintiffs Oppose Uber’s Summary Judgment Motion April 9, 2020April 9, 2020 / Admin Plaintiffs filed their opposition to Uber’s summary judgment motion on February 26, 2018. Below are Plaintiffs’ filings opposing summary judgment. Plaintiff’s Memorandum Opposing Summary Judgment Plaintiff’s Statement of Facts in Opposition to Summary Judgment
Jan 26, 2018: Uber Moves for Summary Judgment April 9, 2020 / Admin On January 26, 2018, Uber moved for summary judgment on the core issue of whether drivers are employees or independent contractors. Below are the documents filed by Uber. Uber’s Memorandum in Support of Summary Judgment Uber’s Statement of Undisputed Facts
Sept. 13, 2017: Judge Baylson Denies Uber’s Motion on Compensability; Next the Parties will Brief the Core Issue of Whether Drivers are Employees September 15, 2017 / Admin Continue reading →
June 16, 2017 and Aug. 4, 2017: Plaintiffs argue that they should be paid for time spent online. August 18, 2017 / Admin Continue reading →
May 26, 2017: Uber’s latest motion argues that, even if drivers are employees, they are not entitled to be paid for time spent online. May 30, 2017 / Admin Continue reading →
March 3, 2017: Uber issues a refund, a new addendum formally increases Uber’s commission, and local drivers affiliate with the Newspaper Guild March 3, 2017 / Admin Continue reading →
Dec. 29, 2016: Uber Files an Answer to the First Amended Complaint January 9, 2017 / Admin Continue reading →
Dec. 15, 2016: Judge Baylson Denies Uber’s Third Motion to Dismiss, Allowing Plaintiffs’ Overtime Claims to Proceed December 15, 2016December 15, 2016 / Admin / 1 Comment Continue reading →
Nov. 28, 2016: Plaintiffs Oppose Uber’s Motion to Dismiss their Overtime Claims and Strike Allegations from the Amended Complaint November 30, 2016December 1, 2016 / Admin Continue reading →
Nov. 1, 2016: Uber Moves to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Overtime Claims and Certain Allegations from the Amended Complaint November 30, 2016December 1, 2016 / Admin Continue reading →
