Philadelphia UberBLACK Lawsuit

Razak, et al. v. Uber Technologies, Inc., et al., Civ. No. 16-0573 (E.D. Pa)

Skip to content
  • Home
  • About
  • Media Coverage
  • Contact
  • Drivers’ Attorney
Search

Oct. 13, 2016: Following Judge Baylson’s Order, Plaintiffs File an Amended Complaint with Additional Overtime Allegations

November 30, 2016December 1, 2016 / Admin

Continue reading →

Oct. 7, 2016: Judge Baylson Issues an Opinion Finding that the Allegations State an Employment Relationship, but not a Fiduciary Relationship

November 30, 2016December 1, 2016 / Admin

Continue reading →

Sept. 2, 2016: Plaintiffs File their Brief in Opposition to Uber’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings

November 30, 2016December 1, 2016 / Admin

Continue reading →

Aug. 19, 2016: Uber files a Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings

November 30, 2016December 1, 2016 / Admin

Continue reading →

July 21, 2016: Judge Baylson Denies Uber’s Motion to Dismiss and Compel Arbitration

November 30, 2016December 2, 2016 / Admin

Continue reading →

June 21, 2016: The Court Hears Oral Argument on Uber’s Motion to Dismiss and Compel Arbitration

November 30, 2016December 1, 2016 / Admin

Continue reading →

April 29, 2016: Plaintiffs File their Brief in Opposition to Uber’s Motion to Dismiss and Compel Arbitration

November 30, 2016December 1, 2016 / Admin

Continue reading →

March 31, 2016: Uber Moves to Dismiss the Case and Compel Arbitration

November 30, 2016December 1, 2016 / Admin

Continue reading →

Feb. 18, 2016: Uber Answers the Original Complaint

November 30, 2016December 1, 2016 / Admin

Continue reading →

Feb. 4, 2016: Uber Removes the Lawsuit to Federal Court

November 30, 2016November 30, 2016 / Admin

Continue reading →

Posts navigation

← Older posts
Newer posts →

Drivers’ Attorney

Jeremy E. Abay, Esq.
Sacks Weston Diamond, LLC
1845 Walnut Street, Suite 1600
Philadelphia, PA 19103
Tel: (215) 925-8200
jabay@sackslaw.com

About the Lawsuit

Razak, et al. v. Uber Technologies, Inc., et al., Civ. No. 16-0573 (E.D. Pa)

A putative class action was filed by three UberBLACK drivers in federal court in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The lawsuit claims that Uber and its subsidiary, Gegen, misclassify UberBLACK drivers as independent contractors. The lawsuit seeks wages and reimbursement of business expenses for UberBLACK drivers operating in Philadelphia.

Uber cannot retaliate against its drivers for participating in this lawsuit.

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Recent Posts

  • March 17, 2020: Uber Seeks En Banc Review of Appellate Opinion April 9, 2020
  • March 3, 2020: Third Circuit Revives UberBLACK Drivers’ Case April 9, 2020
  • Oral Argument Audio Now Available From Appellate Court April 9, 2020
  • May 1, 2019: Uber Files Supplemental Authority, Citing New DOL Memo April 9, 2020
  • April 11, 2019: Uber’s IPO Filings Identify Philadelphia Drivers’ Case as a Threat April 9, 2020
Blog at WordPress.com.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
Cancel